Blog Layout

Sustainable Germany (14): Mannheim's Local Green Deal and the Mannheim Message of European Mayors

Ulrich Graute • 2 November 2021

Achieving Climate Neutrality by 2030

World leaders are currently gathering in Glasgow for the 26th UN Climate Change Conference of the Parties (COP26). Hopefully, they will commit to more ambitious climate action and find answers to the worrying global impacts of climate change. However, much of the response will have to be at the local level. Cities are where both the concrete impacts and the local capacity to find solutions come together. Cities have the power to unlock the potential for ambitious local climate action for a carbon-neutral and socially just future.


Therefore, it is good that cities and regions are present in Glasgow. ICLEI and the Scottish Government in cooperation with Cities and Regions in the UNFCCC processes joined up and host a Multilevel Action Pavilion @ UNFCCC COP26 [1]. On 2 November 2021 the City of Mannheim organized at the pavilion a session 'The Local Green Deal – Achieving Climate Neutrality by 2030 with Mannheim's Innovative Governance Approach'. It explored Mannheim’s innovative Local Green Deal and how the model could be applied in other cities around Europe and the world.



Leitbild Mannheim - guiding principles for the City of Mannheim

The City Council of the City of Mannheim adopted in 2019 a Leitbild Mannheim 2030 describing seven focus areas for its future development. [2]

Picture: Cover of the guiding principles for the City of Mannheim 'Leitbild Mannheim'


Mannheim understands by Leitbild this:


  • An endeavor to describe what life will be like in Mannheim in the coming years and what it means to be a native of Mannheim; it is regularly checked and updated;
  • Something to tackle; a tool to enable urban society to participate meaningfully in the future of the city;
  • A guideline to address a range of measures in such a way that the short-term achievements enable the implementation of long-term goals;
  • No plan to replace all other strategies; we acknowledge that, in addition to the model, other strategies are being implemented in the city administration and together we ensure that these are in line with the model;
  • It will be particularly effective if the city community commits itself to acting consistently in accordance with the 17 sustainability goals;
  • No bureaucratic stop sign and will not stop innovation and other work in the city.

Leitbild Mannheim 2030, page 6.


Strategic goals


At the centre of the Leibild are seven strategic goals


  1. Mannheim guarantees educational equity and prevents poverty. The social and cultural participation for all Mannheimers (i.e. the people living in the city) is ensured.
  2. Mannheim offers an exemplary urban quality of life with high a standard of security as a basis for a healthy, happy life for people of each age and through which the city gains the support of the people.
  3. Mannheim's urban society is shaped by solidarity and it is for other metropolises a model for living together. Assured are the equality of the sexes and the recognition of diverse human identities and life designs.
  4. Mannheim is characterized by a strong urban society and good administrative management. The Mannheimers make active use of possibilities to engage in the development of their city through democratic and transparent processes.
  5. Mannheim as a digital and innovative metropolis provides the requirements for companies of all sizes to realize diverse and sustainable value added value as well as to attract talents and specialists.
  6. Mannheim is climate-friendly - and in future will be a climate-neutral - and resilient city serving as an example for environmentally conscious life and action.
  7. Mannheim is a role model for them international cooperation of cities. Communal development policy and responsible consumption contribute to global justice and sustainable international politics.


The city administration of Mannheim undertakes to implement the above goals in financially sustainable way without spending more than it collects. All decisions by the City Council and the Mayor must be made taking into account financial consequences. However, to make best use of available financial resources the mission statement is considered as providing an apropriate framework. 




The Mannheim Message

With the Mannheim Message, the mayors and decision-makers of Europe’s cities and regions are responding to the European Green Deal. Launched in the context of 'Mannheim2020 - the 9th European Conference on Sustainable Cities and Towns', 30 Sept-2 October 2020, the document builds on the legacy and principles of the Aalborg Charter (1994), the Aalborg Commitments (2004) and the Basque Declaration (2016) and reflects the aim of integrated sustainable urban and regional development, as supported by the Leipzig Charter. Today, one year since its launch, 54 cities or region, 61 organisations, and 127 individuals have endorsed the Mannheim Message [3].


Mayors endorsing the Mannheim Message sign up to this:


"We, mayors and decision-makers of European cities and regions, actively support the European Green Deal by developing and implementing Local Green Deals together with our local communities. Our Local Green Deals will bring together our citizens and stakeholders around a strategy aligned with the goals, priorities and principles of the European Green Deal and the New Leipzig Charter."


An they therefore propose that both their Local Green Deals and the European Green Deal be built upon the following five core systemic changes, for which the signatories commit to take action:


✪  Transformation of our current local infrastructure and systems

We will apply agile and innovative solutions to transform our local infrastructure and service systems for a post-carbon society, including smart digital technology and green and blue infrastructure, to improve the quality of our public spaces, support adaptation to climate change, enhance biodiversity, and support public health and quality of life.

 

✪  Local development beyond growth and competition

We will create local and regional economies that prioritize the protection of the climate, natural resources, biodiversity and ecosystems in economic development, and put the health and quality of life of current and future generations at their centre.

 

✪  Cooperation, solidarity and inclusion

We will build urban and regional communities on principles of participation, transparency, inclusion and non-discrimination that make our cities and regions attractive, safe and healthy homes for all residents.

 

  A lifestyle and culture of sufficiency and optimisation

We will ensure that our infrastructure, services, production methods and business models do not primarily support efficiency and maximisation of output, but circularity, sufficiency and optimisation, maintaining the value and utility of our assets in support of the quality of life for all. In this we note that culture is an important driver and supports dialogue and cohesion in the development and implementation of local sustainability strategies.

 

✪ Re-orientation towards the common good

We will implement a local and regional governance model that strengthens the common good with the help of co-creation and social innovation, and supports social economy approaches and new forms of social enterprises and investment, as well as public private people partnerships. In this we increase the resilience of our local economies and communities in line with our sustainability agenda.


Interested mayors may sign up to the Mannheim Message following this link:

https://conferences.sustainablecities.eu/mannheim2020/mannheim-message/

 


Mannheim's mayor on the Mannheim Message and Mannheim's Green Deal


Mannheim regards itself as pilot city to implement of the Local Green Deal (LGD). ICLEI interviewed Mannheim's Mayor, Dr. Peter Kurz, to reflect on how the Message – and its call to localise the EU Green Deal – has been implemented, and how he sees Mannheim’s sustainable future.[3]


Since last year’s conference, the City of Mannheim has taken great strides to localise the European Green Deal. What do your local “Mannheim Green Deals” look like, and how have you gone about crafting and implementing them?


Fortunately, we had already begun our transformation before the Mannheim Message was launched, so we weren’t starting from scratch. In fact, we have long been a “city of transformation”. However, the logical next step immediately after Mannheim2020 was to begin aligning our strategic mission statement, which is based on the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals, with the EU Green Deal targets.


Today, we are acting as a Local Green Deal (LGD) pilot city. This is a dynamic process – we see an LGD as a framework for concrete municipal and community action, and as a recovery and resilience plan to help transform our city and local economy towards sustainability and climate neutrality.


The first step in translating this vision into concrete action was to establish our Local Green Deal Office, which was charged with exploring the potential for tailored LGDs associated with each of our urban projects in the areas of climate, zero pollution, clean and circular economy, ecosystems and biodiversity, mobility, sustainable food, clean energy, and energy-efficient buildings. These tailored LGDs also had to incorporate the three cross-cutting themes of citizen and stakeholder participation, just transition, and knowledge transfer and innovation.


We then assessed the potential of LGDs for all departments’ and city enterprises’ projects, identified gaps in strategies and goals, and brought together ideas, projects and actors in a coordinated way.


The municipal council recently adopted an initial LGD and we set out new targets: Mannheim aims to reach climate neutrality by 2030.


Mannheim is an industrial city, so large companies play an important role in making their own relevant and visible contributions to this ambitious goal.


As such, they are central to our next step: the twenty companies that make up the Mannheim Climate Protection Alliance will present their proposals for climate action by the end of October.


How have the Mannheim Message’s five core systemic changes and nine policy shifts shaped your approach to Local Green Deals in Mannheim?


For readers’ context, those systemic changes are: 1) transformation of infrastructure, 2) development beyond growth, 3) cooperation and inclusion, 4) a culture of sufficiency, and 5) reorientation toward the common good. The nine policy shifts are: 1) safeguarding public income, 2) shifting taxes away from labour, 3) sufficient financial support, 4) local value chains, 5) integrated land use, 6) new use of urban space, 7) needs-driven research, 8) replacing products with services, and 9) guaranteed living income.


Our Local Green Deal brings together and concretises sustainability and climate goals, focuses on socially just transformation, uses funding and financing opportunities in a targeted manner, and integrates international commitments and networks. As such, the LGD is poised to catalyse best practice examples and projects which make the principles in the Mannheim Message a reality.


Organising and managing a programme as comprehensive as Mannheim’s Local Green Deal is quite ambitious. Clear communication, transparent policies and an enabling administration are decisive– the Mannheim Message has laid the groundwork for that.

Please find the full interview here: [4]



[1] COP26 Multilevel Action Pavilion https://app.hopin.com/events/cop26-multilevel-action-pavilion/reception - accessed on 2 November 2021


[2] Stadt Mannheim: Leitbild Mannheim 2030

https://www.mannheim.de/sites/default/files/2019-09/MA_Leitbild_final_barrierefrei.pdf - accessed on 2 November 2021


[3] Mannheim Message

https://conferences.sustainablecities.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/_temp_/Mannheim2020/Message/Mannheim-Message.pdf - accessed on 2 November 2021


[4] ICLEI interview with Mannheim's Mayor, Dr. Peter Kurz

https://iclei-europe.org/news/?c=search&uid=dDql6oLF - accessed on 2 November 2021

Policies and Governance for Resilient and Sustainable Cities and Regions

by Ulrich Graute 1 January 2025
It was a tremendous privilege in my life to meet Rosalynn and Jimmy Carter for the first time in 1984 (picture) and then again in the summer of 1985 during my internship at Koinonia Farm near Americus, Georgia (USA). Jimmy Carter, who served as the 39th president of the U.S. from 1977 to 1981, died on December 29, 2024, at his home in Plains, Ga. Jimmy Carter was a lifelong farmer who worked with his hands building houses for the poor well into his 90s. I didn't agree with him on all issues (the early 1980s were the time of a new US missile deployment in Germany ordered by Jimmy Carter and a large peace movement against it) but he took the time to discuss it with me and others at Koinonia Farm. That alone was amazing. Even more mind-blowing was that he continued hands-on work on peacebuilding and house renovation for the poor around the world with Habitat for Humanity International well into his 90s. If in my career providing hands-on support became more important than climbing my own career path, this was also due to the example Jimmy Carter gave in the decades after his Presidency. I learned a lot from him about working for peace with humbleness, love, and perseverance. Read more in the New York Times about why Jimmy Carter was known as much for his charity and diplomatic work later in life as he was for his single presidential term, which ended in 1981. https://lnkd.in/d9qxSmTM *. *. *. *. * Note: This post was first published on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/posts/graute_learning-to-work-hands-on-for-peace-from-activity-7279396908270309376-BBjV?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop
by Ulrich Graute 2 December 2024
In 2024, for the first time since 2000, the Parties to the United Nations Rio Conventions on biodiversity, climate change, and desertification faced a very busy 3 months, moving from large Conferences of Parties (COP) in Cali (Colombia) for biodiversity in October to Baku (Azerbaijan) for climate in November to Riyadh (Saudi Arabia) for desertification in December. On top of this Triple-COP, there was the UN High Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development and the UN Summit of the Future in September in New York (USA) while UN-Habitat held its World Urban Forum in Cairo (Egypt), and let’s not forget the fifth session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee to develop an international legally binding instrument on plastic pollution, including in the marine environment (INC-5) which ended last weekend in Busan, South Korea. No real breakthroughs were reported but I noticed many promises to double future efforts. There is a lot that can be critically reviewed about the events, eg what’s the purpose of moving approximately 100.000+ delegates, UN staffers, and other participants worldwide if the necessary political will to agree and resources available are insufficient and the outcomes are limited accordingly? But such a critique would be a bit unfair since I don’t know how many new ideas and initiatives were born during those official meetings, side events, and informal chats that might bloom up in upcoming years despite of the multicrises we’re living in. What needs to be criticized is that the UN System is not progressing on its task to implement its many mandates more “synergistically” by targeting policies, programs, and initiatives to jointly address the goals of the Rio Conventions, SDGs, etc. Instead, the conferences referred to each other but worked mainly within their silos. This is not appropriate in a world full of interrelations and interdepensies. Well, no individual or group can follow up on every aspect, and swarm intelligence of conferences with thousands of participants each seems to be no functioning alternative. But what else could be done? To give an example: How about building an AI-based Large Language Model (LLM) trained with the UN Charter, all UN declarations, national and subnational resolutions, regulations, and programmes? AI Agents for the different conventions and agendas should then be asked to coordinate and propose “synergistic” proposals across policy levels. Of course, the use of artificial intelligence should be wisely supervised by a team of AI experts and professionals from all affected fields. I wouldn’t expect AI applications to solve all problems but to better inform decision-makers and UN agencies on integrated scenarios. This could help to increase efficiency, avoid duplicating efforts, and increase the overall problem-solving capacity of the UN. I would be happy to support such work with my governance and development experience across all policy levels. Picture source: https://www.iisd.org/articles/policy-analysis/cop-nature-climate-adaptation-mitigation
by Ulrich Graute 14 November 2024
Since the first climate COP in 1995, the Local Governments and Municipal Authorities (LGMA) Constituency has been representing local and regional governments at the processes under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). The LGMA also represents ISOCARP - International Society of City and Regional Planners and Global Taskforce of Local and Regional Governments. ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability acts as the Focal Point of LGMA. The 2015 Paris Agreement marked a turning point, recognizing the essential role of these governments in enhancing Nationally Determined Contributions NDSs and driving transformative climate action. The LGMA is atively present in Baku with a robust agenda, numerous partners, and an esteemed delegation of political leaders representing local and subnational governments. At the center of the presence is the Multilevel Action & Urbanization Pavilion as the global stage for the city and region climate agenda during COP29. The Pavilion brings into focus not only the challenges and needs, but also the accomplishments and commitments of local and subnational actors on climate action. The Pavilion is open from 12 to 22 November in the Blue Zone, Area E, Pavilion I15. We are looking forward to welcoming you at the High-Level Opening on 12 November at 10:00 AM. Please find the agenda of LGMA attached. Please visit also the Youtube channel of ICLEI Global for daily updates https://lnkd.in/dddDCKtA Ulrich Graute - ISOCARP Online Delegate at COP29 and Chair of the ISOCARP Scientific Committee
by Ulrich Graute 19 October 2024
Report on the Urban Conversation on Ethical Use of AI in Urban Planning at the 60th World Planning Congress in Siena, Italy on 11 OCTOBER 2024
by Ulrich Graute 1 October 2024
Date: 11 October 2024 Time: 10:45 - 13:15 Room: Accademie. Fisiocritici Session background and a short description of the Content Cities form the heart of human development and innovation, with 80% of global GDP generated within them and according to the United Nations approximately 56% of the world’s population now live in cities, and likely to reach nearly 70% by 2050. At the same time, the urban world is on a journey to revitalize cities, build new cities for growing populations, to dismantle inequalities, and to create a sustainable urban legacy for future generations. The growth and demands of cities are rapidly changing and looking (or exploring) for new systems and planning tools. In this situation, Artificial Intelligence (AI) provides a transformative potential in managing and planning cities. It can support, analyze, and predict the impact of policy changes, demographic shifts and development plans. AI facilitates a valuable foundation for productive dialogue and constructive debate between municipal authorities, and the public and private sector. AI enables the People-focused city through systems integration and collaborations. Simultaneously, the application of generative AI in the public domain brings a number of risks and pitfalls. To assure an ethical use of the new wave of innovation in planning it is necessary to strike a careful balance between risk mitigation and harnessing its capabilities for public good and resilience. The central concept of modern Artificial Intelligence (AI) is the intelligent agent. As of today, we have limitations to building one general-purpose AI program that does everything, instead AI developers build different types of agent programs for different types of problems and contexts. AI researchers agree that the new wave of innovation will impact all spheres of life and require more actors for future developments of AI. The discussion on the use of AI cannot be left alone to IT programmers and code developers. In this context, the objective of the conversation is to bring together planning practitioners and experts from city-making to discuss the use and potential impact of AI in urban planning and management and the related leadership of ISOCARP in the global dialogue on AI governance and capacity building of planners. Recent examples eg from Australia and Saudi Arabia will be presented along with panel discussions. Session Organizers Dr Ulrich Graute, Chair of the ISOCARP Scientific Committee, Berlin Dr Sunil Dubey, The UNSW Cities Institute, Sydney. 1. Introduction to the theme of the session by Ulrich Graute 2. The making of inclusive, prosperous and sustainable cities and the new challenges and opportunities provided by AI and Data 2.1 The case of Australia - Key note by Dr Sarah Hill, CEO Greater Sydney Commission and Western Parkland City Authority (New South Wales Govt, former) ‘Planning New Cities and Inclusive economic development’ - Western Sydney Aerotropolis – Australia’s 22nd Century City Making through Community, Creativity and Innovation. 2.2 The case of Saudi Arabia (10 min) Progress, Peace & Prosperity 2030 – How Saudi Cities are transforming using data and power of Ai. Dr Sunil Dubey 3. Roundtable Moderation: Ulrich Graute Guiding questions include AI in Urban Planning: Navigating the Intersection of Technology and Values – AI as a technical tool and/or as co-pilot in planning New Cities and inclusive economic development. Including AI in existing planning systems and processes and the requirement eg of a regulatory framework and capacity-building. What shape will AI have on future cities? ISOCARP and the new wave of technological innovation. Panelists: Sarah Hill, Executive Project Director (Public Investment Fund PIF, Saudi Arabia) Eric Huybrecht, Congress Director ISOCARP’s 60th WPC, Institute Paris Region Elisabeth Belpaire, ISOCARP President-Elect Ulrich Graute, Chair of ISOCARP SciCom Sunil Dubey, Smart Cities thought leader. Website of the 60th ISOCARP World Planning Congress https://isocarp.org/activities/60th-wpc-siena-2024/ Website of the Academy of Social Sciences (UK) AI in urban planning: risks and opportunities https://acss.org.uk/publications/ai-in-urban-planning-risks-and-opportunities/
by Ulrich Graute 15 August 2024
Privacy Communicting with AI raises privacy concerns A CV is personal documents including private information you may not want to share with everybody. Therefore, the sending of your CV to somebody (eg as part of an application or business offer) is usually considered as confidential. Using generative AI, for instance ChatGPT, to work on your CV, website or LinkedIn profile should be carefully considered because the info you share about yourself with ChatGPT stays with ChatGPT even if you delete it from your account after you finished your conversation. Nonetheless, I decided to take it easier using AI because my profile and CV is no secret in anyway. Through dozens of publications since the 1990s, speeches at many conferences worldwide, as blogger with an own website (www.ugraute.de) and a LinkedIn profile with close to 6000 followers you can find everything what’s written in my CV somewhere on the internet. And, most importantly, I carefully review everything that AI suggests to me, I review and finalize texts before I use them. While I cannot fully exclude misuse of information, the responsibility for the content of my website and CV remains with me. And I still use a CV version not aided by AI for business offers and applications. AI as a second eye - When should you consider using AI to review your CV and profile? After 16 years of mostly (but not only) working for the United Nations I am now shifting more attention beyond the UN to the private sector, national and local authorities, other international organizations, NGOs etc. All UN agencies have their own mandates, interests and priorities. As UN staffer and later as UN consultant I learnt the rules of the institution and lived with the limitations they generate for management and goal achievement. However, the UN, with its historical baggage of countless mandates, inadequate structures and resources and some overly cautious employees, at times stands in its own way. I want to continue supporting global cooperation using my global perspective, my skills in project and program management, cross-cultural communication, policy analysis and stakeholder cooperation. However, it is time to refocus and look at my skills and achievements from a different, a non-UN perspective. This is where AI comes into play as an additional opportunity to support the reorientation of my or your career. AI supports my own reflections on my interests and strategy and it does it in a very inspirational way. I recommend the same to others but, if possible, it should be only an opportunity in addition to exchange with friends, colleagues, books, trainers, coaches etc. How did I use Chat GPT to review my website and CV? ChatGPT is a conversational tool, and it’s for free in its basic version. You can login here: https://chatgpt.com/auth/login. After opening an account and login you find a box where you can enter you question (called prompt). You push Enter and get an answer within seconds. If the answer is not inspirational, correct or satisfying you just go on submitting a new or modified prompt. This way conversations with ChatGPT becomes conversational and easy. In this process ChatGPT gets to know you better and learns from your prompts. Prompting, ie formulating the right questions is key to get useful answers out of the conversation and it’s worth to spend some time training how to prompt. In my case, an earlier prompt submitted to ChatGPT had produced already this suggestion: “Adjust your communication style to match the language and expectations of non-UN clients, avoiding overly technical or UN-specific jargon.” That was the point when ChatGPT confirmed my own guess that I have to change communication when I look beyond the UN world. To further explore this, I submitted additional prompts including this one: “ChatGPT, please rewrite my CV in a style more appealing to private companies.” The answer after my own review and fine tuning produced the short CV version which you can find here: https://www.ugraute.de/bio-and-cv Could I have produced this without AI? Of course, I have produced two pages versions of my CV on my own. The point is, that many things which are super important at the UN as “ an animal of its own kind ” are not so relevant outside of the UN. In such situations it may take a lot of time to decide what to leave in and what to take out of your CV. A second eye like AI proposing specific cuts and a repackaging can be very inspirational and helpful to get a fresh and crispier look at your own experience and credentials. I also liked very much that ChatGPT explained its approach to me: “To make your CV more appealing to private companies, I'll focus on making the language more dynamic, emphasizing your key achievements, leadership roles, and strategic impact. I'll also streamline the format for clarity and brevity.” Of course, I reviewed the suggested version of my CV and other website texts revised by AI to confirm the correctness of the content. Overall, this review exercise is a test to use a new technical tool. It is certainly inspirational. Success remains to be seen but that is also the case when I review my CV for an application or if I review my website in a traditional way. I decided for an open approach to use AI and to talk about my personal experience in this post, because in this new wave of innovation, we are all learners and can help each other. As adviser, I like to share, teach, and keep learning, inside or outside of the UN.
by Ulrich Graute 8 August 2024
Figure: Human-in-the-loop intervention. ‘The Ethical Concerns of Artificial Intelligence in Urban Planning’ Thomas W. Sanchez, Marc Brenman, and Xinyue Ye (2024)
by Ulrich Graute 3 August 2024
Human Compatible - AI and the Problem of Control
by Ulrich Graute 9 July 2024
A slide from the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA) presented at the opening of HLPF highlights that only 17% of the SDG targets are on track
by Ulrich Graute 5 July 2024
Background and Objectives The Gerd Albers Award (GAA) is celebrating inspiring publications such as books and essays. It was established in 1999 in honor of Professor Gerd Albers, a co-founder and past president of ISOCARP, who placed a particular emphasis on the task of publishing as a means of elucidating both the current debate and practical achievements in the planning field. This reputable award is given for the high-quality academic publications written by ISOCARP members. Eligible entries Pertinent submissions include the following publications by ISOCARP members published in the period between July 1, 2023, and June 31, 2024: • Books and/or Book chapters • Journal articles • Published project reports Exhibition catalogues and/or unpublished reports are ineligible. Unpublished journal articles are eligible if the publisher’s acceptance letter is attached to the article submitted. Evaluation criteria Content: • Thematic introduction • Contribution to discussions on the topic • Consistence and coherence (conceptual background, methodological approach) • Target audience Design: • Clarity • Technical requirements • Production Language All languages are eligible, although the “official languages” of the Society are English, French, German, and Spanish. Non-English entries must have an extended abstract in English (min. 3 pages). Jury The jury consists of three members of the ISOCARP Scientific Committee and the A&P Program Director. The deliberations and votes of the jury are confidential. Prof. Sebnem Hoskara Dr. Ulrich Graute Dr. Dorota Kamrowska-Załuska Prof. Ali A. Alraouf (A&P Program Director) Substance of the Award The Award is bestowed in three categories: GAA ‘Best Book’, GAA ‘Best Article’ and Special Mention. The Award winners are announced during the official ceremony at the ISOCARP annual World Planning Congress. GAA ‘Best Book’ and GAA ‘Best Article’ get two years of free membership to ISOCARP, official ISOCARP award certification and its dissemination through the ISOCARP website, social media and newsletter. Special Mention gets an official ISOCARP award certification and its dissemination through the ISOCARP website, social media and newsletter. Who is eligible? • Scholars • Writers • Book Authors • Researchers • Urban and City Critics • Professors and Academics Prize • Recognition at the ISOCARP 60th Congress in Siena at the Awards Special Session. • Certificate. • ISOCARP Medal. • Waiving form the registration for a single representative of the winners. • One year Membership at ISOCARP for a single representative of the winners. Registration fee 150 Euros for each entry in the Best Book Award (a candidate can apply with multiple proposals). 50 Euros for each entry in the Best Paper Award (a candidate can apply with multiple proposals). Submission material ⦁ Contribution (book/chapter/article) in pdf format Application procedure 1. Submit your online application https://isocarp.org/gerd-albers-award-2024-submission-form/ 2. Pay the registration fee: 150 Euros for Best Book Award and 50 Euros for Best Paper Award 3. Please, send your application to Ali Alraouf, ISOCARP Board member (alialraouf@isocarp.org) and ISOCARP HQ (awards@isocarp.org). Kindly specify the email subject: GAA 2024 Candidature. Deadline for submission August 15, 2024 Submit your application here https://isocarp.org/gerd-albers-award-2024-submission-form/
More posts

Contact Ulrich Graute

Share by: