When I worked at the UN Headquarters about 15 years ago the UN campus was undergoing a major renovation. No doubt, International Organizations (IO) and most prominently the United Nations are doing an amazing work to promote peace and security, sustainable development, to fight climate change, maintain multilevel cooperation, rule of law, to overcome inequality, close the gender gap etc. I don’t want to play this down but it seems that the system of international cooperation and organizations is currently not fit, innovative and self-confident enough to be part of the solution for growing complexity of challenges. For instance:
· 2030 Agenda, Paris Agreement, New Urban Agenda, other mandates – Yes, multiple work processes, programs and projects are ongoing but goal achievement is often off track and nobody is in sight to cover financial gaps preventing goal achievement.
· Wars in Ukraine, Gaza, Somalia, Sudan …. – Yes, IOs are present but financing of projects and programs is at risk with the US and others withdrawing from earlier commitments. In addition, IO and UN are currently no driver of change.
At times, it seems that IOs including the UN, in spite of their activities sit mesmerized like a rabbit fixated by a snake, waiting for the worst to happen. If continued, this could turn suicidal caused by fear of making mistakes when embarking on new paths.
The UN as part of the solution
Just imagine for a moment…
…the UN would switch its currently predominant focus from process orientation to result orientation and to where it realistically can achieve goals.
It’s an old story at the UN that keeping a development process on-going is the second-best choice if a problem cannot be solved at the first place. Sounds reasonable but this way many mandates are dragged on without major progress over years or even decades. In a sense, the UN is like a Christmas tree. At each Summit, member states add new mandates to be tree making it look shiny but without ensuring that the organization remains fit for goal achievement. Unfortunately, if continued, trust in the problem-solving competence of the UN and support for the organization might further sink towards zero. Instead, a refocus could help the institution to become a goal achiever and by that way to recommend itself for new tasks and responsibilities.
And further imagine
…. the UN would develop a narrative, convincing strategy and structural proposal for an UN overwhaul until 2030.
The UN Charter should remain the foundation. But, what do you think, how the UN, its mandates and structure should look like in the age of digitization, artificial intelligence, climate change, inequality and continuously strong national preferences? If the UN itself would come up with a proposal it could become (again) the driver of dialog and development. On the long run global cooperation is without alternative but there is nothing good unless it is done by somebody.
Yes, to relaunch the UN work may require new ideas and more skin in the game, as the renovation 15 years ago required ideas and funds. That’s always easier said if you stay outside. However, it’s always better to be prepared and the UN has thousands of qualified staff and a global convening power among partners. If I would be the UN, I wouldn’t wait until somebody comes, disrupts the 80 years young lady UN or builds straightaway an alternative IO outside of the current multilateral system.
The European Union is currently challenged in a similar way. It has to grow up to the challenge and that very fast but it has done so several times in the past. There are risks but they are without real alternative.