Inclusive Cities Leaving No One Behind - Neither a Myth nor a Reality but Work in Progress

Ulrich Graute • 1 July 2021

Inclusive Cities Through a Multidisciplinary Approach


Inclusive cities which leave no one behind are not a reality but they are also not simply a myth. Instead, they are work in progress. To be inclusive for all citizens this is a goal cities all around the world are striving for but it is unlikely that being an inclusive city would be a goal a city may achieve once and forever. There will be always new challenges and opportunities that emerge. Therefore, the term inclusive cities should indicate more a process towards inclusiveness as a long term goal than describing a status secured.

 

For three days in June 2021 participants from South Africa, the Global South and with support from European experts discussed options to build inclusive cities. Organizers had picked a multidisciplinary approach which was reflected by the thematic areas of the event:

  1. Urban Integrated Transport Systems: Towards efficient, affordable, accessible and secure public transport for all,
  2. Twinning Urban Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change: Towards clean, healthy and secure cities for all,
  3. Inclusive urban designs and the Covid-19 pandemic,
  4. Rural-urban interdependencies and linkages for inclusive cities,
  5. Inclusive cities – Focus on vulnerable group (women and Children, people living with disabilities, migrants and the urban poor), and
  6. Inclusive cities and affordable housing.


A multidisciplinary, multi-level and truly comprehensive approach is required

Presentations and discussions at the symposium, its panels and breakout rooms often had the character of a search for a common understanding on what is to be understood by a truly inclusive city and what needs to be done to move closer to the goal. To not get lost in complexity presenters and discussants tended to anchor their contribution on one or two policy areas and explored from there how to embrace the bigger challenge of inclusive cities.

 

Piotr Lorens began the search during his keynote at the opening panel. His anchor subject was social housing but the full title already demonstrated that social housing is not a stand-alone subject: ‘The Need of Social Face of (not only) Social Housing - Focus on Post-Pandemic Challenges’. In parts the keynote provided a to-do-list for inclusive cities. Ambrose Adebayo, chair of the panel and Professor Emeritus, School of Built Environment & Development Studies UKZN recalled the New Urban Agenda of the United Nations which includes the notion of a ‘right to the city’ and a place to dwell as precondition to actively participate in the life of the city.   

 

Peter Bikam of the University of Venda (SA) in his intervention on the second day stated that the issue is not planning but service delivery. With this remark he put the focus on policy implementation which is too often lagging behind the more attractive formulation of new policies. In a similar intention Elizabeth Belpaire stated that the world is failing and that more attention needs to be paid to the health of people and of the planet.

 

Following these interventions which widened the scope of inclusive cities it was almost natural that some of the following presenters would argue in favor of comprehensive approaches. Puven Akkiah of Ethekwini Municipality expressed the need for long-term goals and perspectives. For him short termism is the enemy of inclusivism. He also said that Sustainable Development Goals and the New Urban Agenda of the United Nations would provide a good framework but that this framework needs to be localized. Nelson Chanza and University of Johannesburg also underscored the need for a comprehensive approach.

 

The need not only for a multidisciplinary but also a multilevel cooperation and coordination was brought up already on the first day be Subharti Moonsammy, the former Head of the Development Planning, Environment and Management Unit of Ethekwini Municipality. She specifically referred to the District Development Modell in South Africa which still needs to be filled with life but which would help to assure better policy coherence.

 

Other speakers – including me – presented tools and methodologies for better cross sector and multilevel cooperation leaving no one behind. The local goal of inclusive cities corresponds to the goal of the United Nations' 2030 Agenda to ‘leave no one behind’. Thus, a better coordination between UN, National and local goals could be mutually beneficial and reinforcing. Wrapping up the discussions of the symposium the chair of the Local Organizing Committee Prof Hangwelani Hope Magidimisha-Chipungu added that the dialogue will be continued at future events of the University of KwaZulu-Natal.


Professional, inclusive and fun

Professional, inclusive and fun – that’s how I would describe the symposium “Achieving Inclusive Cities through a multidisciplinary approach”.

 

The fun part was provoked by surprising incidences like the sudden appearance of the son of Prof Hangwelani Hope Magidimisha-Chipungu on her lap while she was speaking at the plenary on Day 2 of the conference. This added a relaxed and collegial tone to the dialogue and that compensated a bit for the remote character of a Zoom conference without face-to-face meetings.

 

The event has been organized very professionally and by South African stakeholders only: University of KwaZulu Natal (UKZN), University of Johannesburg, University of Venda, eThekwini Metropolitan Municipality, South African Council of Planners (SACPLAN), and South African Cities Network (SACN). I have attended many conferences in and about Africa in recent years but often International Organizations have a key role as donors and organizers. Not so at this conference.

 

In addition, it has been endorsed by the International Society of City and Regional Planners (ISOCARP). Members of the ISOCARP global professional association were sprinkled across the programme and certainly contributed to the quality of the conference. However, the ownership for the conference was with experts from South Africa and some other countries of the Global South.

 

Of course, a lot such conferences are convened in Africa by African national, local and academic institutions every year but it is probably a privilege of the remote working arrangement during the Covid pandemic and the reduced cost for an online conference. It has provided me with this unique opportunity to attend this symposium from my office in Berlin and it has provided the partners from Durban, eThekwini and Johannesburg with the opportunity to convene and international symposium according to own preferences. Therefore, this event may also show a way forward to strengthen African ownership of international dialogues about the future of African cities and Africa in general. It certainly a pleasure for me to attend and support such endeavors.



Documentation of the symposium

Opening panel discussion on Day 1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fd1VhE-IsxU

Panel discussion on Day 2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLHm6FxazeY

Grand finale panel on Day 3
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rWJVVOjsKu8

Tapes on thematic breakout groups are also available on YouTube provided by the University of KwaZulu Natal. For more info see the website of the event
https://inclusivecities.ukzn.ac.za/2021-int-symposium-on-inclusive-cities/


Synopsis for the Grand Finale Panel of the Symposium

Policies and Governance for Resilient and Sustainable Cities and Regions

by Ulrich Graute 14 April 2025
None of the following supports the idea that urban sprawl is required or even helpful to build sustainable cities. However, it is argued that it may be part of the solution for the crisis of affordable housing in many countries of the world. With this post, I would like to encourage a debate, eg, at the 61st ISOCARP World Planning Congress #WPC61 on 1-4 December 2025 in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. In 1976 and alarmed by rapid and uncontrolled urban growth, particularly in the developing world, the UN General Assembly called for the First United Nations Conference on Human Settlements (Habitat I) addressing the challenges and future of human settlements. Housing remained at the focus of the United Nations Human Settlement Programme UN-Habitat ever since, and this was reconfirmed at Habitat III in Quito 2016. The New Urban Agenda recognizes and promotes a "right to the city," meaning the right of all inhabitants to have equal access to the benefits and opportunities that cities offer. It emphasizes a vision where urban spaces are designed and used collectively for the benefit of all, including those in informal settlements. Yes a vision, but overall, the Agenda is not very strategic and invites more to raising picking instead of integrated problem solving. Meanwhile, cities keep struggling to cope with fast urbanization, migration and growing demand for larger apartments. Urban sprawl is criticized since the 1950s and 60s because of its large demand for land. No densely populated urban areas have higher costs for the water, energy and transportation grid. In addition, developers often focus on profitable housing development while they don’t care for urban infrastructure, public spaces, schools etc. The New Urban Agenda promotes urban density as a key strategy for sustainable and efficient urban development but that doesn’t help those who a looking for housing now. Conor Dougherty is the author of the book Golden Gates: The Housing Crisis and a Reckoning for the American Dream published on 10 April 2025 in the New York Times the article “Why America Should Sprawl. The word has become an epithet for garish, reckless growth — but to fix the housing crisis, the country needs more of it.” He doesn’t make any effort to paint urban sprawl in rosy colors. Instead, he describes how eg in Princeton, Texas, the nation’s third-fastest-growing city, infrastructure has struggled to keep up with growth. He analyzes how difficult and slow-moving densification efforts in cities are and states, “Even if all the regulatory restraints were removed tomorrow, developers couldn’t find enough land to satisfy America’s housing needs inside established areas. Consequently, much of the nation’s housing growth has moved to states in the South and Southwest, where a surplus of open land and willingness to sprawl has turned the Sun Belt into a kind of national sponge that sops up housing demand from higher-cost cities. The largest metro areas there have about 20 percent of the nation’s population, but over the past five years they have built 42 percent of the nation’s new single-family homes, according to a recent report by Cullum Clark, an economist at the George W. Bush Institute, a research center in Dallas.” For instance, Celina, Texas (picture), has 54,000 residents, compared with 8,000 just a decade ago, and the population is projected to hit 110,000 by 2030. The lack of urbane infrastructure, employment, greenery, and community is striking, but people keep coming because of affordability. While planners and others prefer denser and walkable neighbourhoods like 15-minute-cities, the money to build related infrastructure in addition to houses is often missing or would reduce affordability. A dilemma. There are good reasons to criticize the trend described for the US by Conor Dougherty, but it provides a chance to attain affordable housing for people who cannot find it elsewhere. And the history of these satellite towns has demonstrated that the missing infrastructure, employment and community can be added lateron. It seems, urban sprawl is not the solution, but it might be part of the solution, isn’t it? Let's discuss this here or later on other occasions, like eg the 61st ISOCARP World Planning Congress 'Cities & Regions in Action: Planning Pathways to Resilience and Quality of Life 1-4 December 2025, in Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia #WPC61. Reference: Why America Should Sprawl. The word has become an epithet for garish, reckless growth — but to fix the housing crisis, the country needs more of it. By Conor Dougherty. The New York Times, April 10, 2025 https://www.nytimes.com/2025/04/10/magazine/suburban-sprawl-texas.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare
by Ulrich Graute 8 March 2025
Picture: UN photo
by Ulrich Graute 25 February 2025
Click to see the map in the full scale or download map in pdf format here https://anatomyof.ai/img/ai-anatomy-map.pdf.
by Ulrich Graute 22 February 2025
About the challenge of providing advice on governance and development in times of disruption and transition (English with German captatio ns) Deutsch: Ulrich spricht darüber, wie es ist, in Zeiten von Umbruch, Wandel und vielfachen Krisen als erfahrener Berater zu arbeiten. Obwohl die Situation nicht einfach ist, kann man daraus auch Chancen für effizientere Institutionen und Unternehmen sehen. Erfahrung und Flexibilität sind dabei wichtig, um neue Wege zu finden. English: Ulrich talks about working as an experienced consultant in times of upheaval, change, and multiple crises. Although the situation is not easy, we can also see opportunities for more efficient institutions and companies. Experience and flexibility are important to find new pathways.
by Ulrich Graute 12 February 2025
"The development of highly capable AI is likely to be the biggest event in human history. The world must act decisively to ensure it is not the last event in human history. This conference, and the cooperative spirit of the AI Summit series, give me hope; but we must turn hope into action, soon, if there is to be a future we would want our children to live in." Professor Stuart Russell, IASEAI President and Distinguished Professor of Computer Science at the University of California, Berkeley Please join me on 13 February 2025 at ARCS 9.0 for my keynote on 'Urban politics, planning, and economy in the Global South in times of fast developing AI' The two weeks before my conference presentation were full of dynamics in the field of AI, its politics, and development. First came the launch of the 500 billion US$ Stargate Project in the USA, followed by the launch of the Chinese open-source large language model (LLM) DeepSeek. On 6 February the International Association for Safe & Ethical AI held its inaugural conference in Paris, France. Prominent AI scientists including Stuart Russel and the 2024 Physics Nobel Laureate Geoffrey Hinton called for international cooperation to ensure safe and ethical artificial intelligence. On 10 and 11 February 2025, France co-chaired by India hosted the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Action Summit in Paris. The speeches by Heads of State and Government including the President of France, the Prime Minister of India, the President of the EU Commission, and the US Vice President gave the impression of how different countries of the world try to position themselves in a race for AI leadership. Urban politics, planning, and economy, not only in the Global South, need longer-term frameworks. How should digital transformation and urban planning be approached in cities facing multiple crises and the new wave of AI technological innovation? The latter is according to the Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and others unprecedented in scale and speed but it is expected to affect all spheres of life. ARCS 9.0 schedule and Zoom link for Inaugural, plenaries and Valedictory. Date - 13th Feb to 15th Feb 2025 Join Zoom Meeting https://zoom.us/j/95336599575?pwd=NExxgf8gBoubEfKRhhtbalM1ZYjQph.1 Meeting ID: 953 3659 9575
by Ulrich Graute 22 January 2025
Source of the picture OpenAI: https://openai.com/index/announcing-the-stargate-project/
by Ulrich Graute 1 January 2025
It was a tremendous privilege in my life to meet Rosalynn and Jimmy Carter for the first time in 1984 (picture) and then again in the summer of 1985 during my internship at Koinonia Farm near Americus, Georgia (USA). Jimmy Carter, who served as the 39th president of the U.S. from 1977 to 1981, died on December 29, 2024, at his home in Plains, Ga. Jimmy Carter was a lifelong farmer who worked with his hands building houses for the poor well into his 90s. I didn't agree with him on all issues (the early 1980s were the time of a new US missile deployment in Germany ordered by Jimmy Carter and a large peace movement against it) but he took the time to discuss it with me and others at Koinonia Farm. That alone was amazing. Even more mind-blowing was that he continued hands-on work on peacebuilding and house renovation for the poor around the world with Habitat for Humanity International well into his 90s. If in my career providing hands-on support became more important than climbing my own career path, this was also due to the example Jimmy Carter gave in the decades after his Presidency. I learned a lot from him about working for peace with humbleness, love, and perseverance. Read more in the New York Times about why Jimmy Carter was known as much for his charity and diplomatic work later in life as he was for his single presidential term, which ended in 1981. https://lnkd.in/d9qxSmTM *. *. *. *. * Note: This post was first published on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/posts/graute_learning-to-work-hands-on-for-peace-from-activity-7279396908270309376-BBjV?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop
by Ulrich Graute 2 December 2024
In 2024, for the first time since 2000, the Parties to the United Nations Rio Conventions on biodiversity, climate change, and desertification faced a very busy 3 months, moving from large Conferences of Parties (COP) in Cali (Colombia) for biodiversity in October to Baku (Azerbaijan) for climate in November to Riyadh (Saudi Arabia) for desertification in December. On top of this Triple-COP, there was the UN High Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development and the UN Summit of the Future in September in New York (USA) while UN-Habitat held its World Urban Forum in Cairo (Egypt), and let’s not forget the fifth session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee to develop an international legally binding instrument on plastic pollution, including in the marine environment (INC-5) which ended last weekend in Busan, South Korea. No real breakthroughs were reported but I noticed many promises to double future efforts. There is a lot that can be critically reviewed about the events, eg what’s the purpose of moving approximately 100.000+ delegates, UN staffers, and other participants worldwide if the necessary political will to agree and resources available are insufficient and the outcomes are limited accordingly? But such a critique would be a bit unfair since I don’t know how many new ideas and initiatives were born during those official meetings, side events, and informal chats that might bloom up in upcoming years despite of the multicrises we’re living in. What needs to be criticized is that the UN System is not progressing on its task to implement its many mandates more “synergistically” by targeting policies, programs, and initiatives to jointly address the goals of the Rio Conventions, SDGs, etc. Instead, the conferences referred to each other but worked mainly within their silos. This is not appropriate in a world full of interrelations and interdepensies. Well, no individual or group can follow up on every aspect, and swarm intelligence of conferences with thousands of participants each seems to be no functioning alternative. But what else could be done? To give an example: How about building an AI-based Large Language Model (LLM) trained with the UN Charter, all UN declarations, national and subnational resolutions, regulations, and programmes? AI Agents for the different conventions and agendas should then be asked to coordinate and propose “synergistic” proposals across policy levels. Of course, the use of artificial intelligence should be wisely supervised by a team of AI experts and professionals from all affected fields. I wouldn’t expect AI applications to solve all problems but to better inform decision-makers and UN agencies on integrated scenarios. This could help to increase efficiency, avoid duplicating efforts, and increase the overall problem-solving capacity of the UN. I would be happy to support such work with my governance and development experience across all policy levels. Picture source: https://www.iisd.org/articles/policy-analysis/cop-nature-climate-adaptation-mitigation
by Ulrich Graute 14 November 2024
Since the first climate COP in 1995, the Local Governments and Municipal Authorities (LGMA) Constituency has been representing local and regional governments at the processes under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). The LGMA also represents ISOCARP - International Society of City and Regional Planners and Global Taskforce of Local and Regional Governments. ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability acts as the Focal Point of LGMA. The 2015 Paris Agreement marked a turning point, recognizing the essential role of these governments in enhancing Nationally Determined Contributions NDSs and driving transformative climate action. The LGMA is atively present in Baku with a robust agenda, numerous partners, and an esteemed delegation of political leaders representing local and subnational governments. At the center of the presence is the Multilevel Action & Urbanization Pavilion as the global stage for the city and region climate agenda during COP29. The Pavilion brings into focus not only the challenges and needs, but also the accomplishments and commitments of local and subnational actors on climate action. The Pavilion is open from 12 to 22 November in the Blue Zone, Area E, Pavilion I15. We are looking forward to welcoming you at the High-Level Opening on 12 November at 10:00 AM. Please find the agenda of LGMA attached. Please visit also the Youtube channel of ICLEI Global for daily updates https://lnkd.in/dddDCKtA Ulrich Graute - ISOCARP Online Delegate at COP29 and Chair of the ISOCARP Scientific Committee
by Ulrich Graute 19 October 2024
Report on the Urban Conversation on Ethical Use of AI in Urban Planning at the 60th World Planning Congress in Siena, Italy on 11 OCTOBER 2024
More posts

Contact Ulrich Graute