One of the strengths of the World Cities Report (WCR) published by UN-Habitat at WUF11 is that it is well structured into ten very informative chapters. In addition, each chapter is well structured. A chapter on Key Findings and Messages of each chapter introduces the report and at the beginning of each chapter the reader finds a summary of Quick Facts and Policy Points as discussed in the upcoming chapter. As an example please find below those facts and points relevant for chapter 8 on Urban Governance.
Writing the report happened mainly during the COVID-19 pandemic and it's probably because of this that each chapter is seen through the lens of the pandemic and public health. The chapter draws lessons like
In the following the chapter reiterates the importance of governing for, and with, new digital technology and the need to improve multilevel governance. It increases the quality of the report a lot that the chapter has a differentiated view on these aspects.
For instance, digitalization is not simply described as a must with all its advantages but also with respect to possible pitfalls of technologically-mediated future cities. Such risks are described with respect to 'Smart City' technologies or facial recognition algorithms. Fortunately, the report also describes how such pitfalls can be prevented.
Towards the end the chapter asks if decentralization (and with that indirectly also democracy) can survive global pandemic and climate change? The answer is yes, provided that the share of people who trust their government can be increased.
I support the need to address the trust equation as suggested by the authors. I also understand that the UN as a value driven organization and many planners based on their own experience highlights the need of democracy, decentralization, participation and accountability as success factors of urban governance. Personally, I am very supportive.
However, the chapter doesn't ask and certainly it doesn't answer how much democracy and participation citizens want in urban governance to express their voice! This is a deficit because the call for more urban democracy and participation is not everywhere and always clear and loud. Do all citizens really want to have a say on everything local? What seems to be louder is the call for effective and efficient service delivery. People want to be heard where they feel ignored but above that they want that the city with its urban services simply functions and delivers. It seems to me, where urban governments (democratic or autocratic) deliver excellent or at least good enough urban services the call for more local democracy and participation is not so strong.
With the above, I am not saying that democratic, decentralized and participative forms of urban governance are not the better ones but in the chapter this position is not supported enough by evidence. The report should be more clear at this point. If there is no clear finding it should be mentioned as such.
The printed version with its 387 pages weighs 1272 grams, almost three times the weight of an iPod or about nine times that of an iPhone. Yes, I consider myself a lucky one because I got a printout ad the World Urban Forum 11 in Katowice, Poland. I like to thumb through a book. I know there is on the downside among others the need to produce paper from trees but on the upside is the fact that a book doesn’t need for its production rare earth like a computer does. It also doesn’t need the electricity for the device and possible clouds all the time while reading it. Overall, I work more and more with electronic versions, and that is fine. However, ones in a while I enjoy reading in a printed report with all its texts, tables and maps.
The full report published by UN-Habitat can be downloaded here: https://unhabitat.org/wcr/